“AITA for choosing to live in a city which will make it nearly impossible for my ex to see his child?”
Co-parenting after divorce is a multifaceted challenge that affects a significant number of families worldwide. Statistically, around 40-50% of marriages in the United States end in divorce, with similar trends observed in many other countries.
These separations often lead to complex arrangements regarding the upbringing of children. Co-parenting requires former partners to navigate their post-divorce relationship in a way that prioritizes the welfare of their children while managing their individual lives and emotions.
The intricacies of co-parenting are magnified when one parent moves away, either for personal reasons or in pursuit of a better support system. This relocation can create a dilemma regarding the involvement of both parents in the child’s life.
The decision to move often involves weighing the benefits of emotional and familial support against the importance of maintaining the physical presence of both parents in the child’s life. This balance is crucial but hard to achieve, as seen in the Reddit post in question.
The Reddit story presents a real-life scenario where a woman, post-divorce, faces unexpected turns in her life, including a pregnancy. Her decisions regarding relocation and co-parenting are influenced by her circumstances, including her support system and personal needs.
Just take a look at the original post…
OP is divorced at 28 from Jon after six years. Diagnosed with PCOS in 2019, treatments and complications make natural conception unlikely.
Tried for 3 years for a baby, but infertility strained their marriage. Despite suggesting fostering and adoption, Jon wasn’t interested.
Amidst months of hostility and no intimacy, she proposed therapy. He opted for divorce, having checked out and preferring not to prolong the situation.
Heartbroken, stuck living together during lockdown. Accepted the end, preparing to move back to hometown during the divorce.
Moved out, mistakenly slept with him, found joy back home. OP then discovered pregnancy while adjusting to their single life.
OP informed Jon about the pregnancy, and he assumed she’d move back. When she decided to raise their child in her hometown, he accused her of spite.
Suggested he move closer for the child, but he insisted his long-standing job made it difficult. Proposed she move back, citing her recent job as a lesser sacrifice.
OP declined his offer to move, choosing the support of her family for work and preparations, avoiding the role of a stay-at-home mom.
He informed his family about the baby without warning, and now she’s facing criticism and legal threats for alleged alienation.
OP is refusing to compromise, especially after she had to uproot her entire life.
Is she wrong for not moving closer to her ex, even though it’s easier for her? Scroll down to see what people had to say…
Jon’s treating her like a brood mare. Lawyer up, get custody, and secure child support.
Scariest part of his offer? The “dependence clause.”
Tossed her once; not playing nanny now.
Ah, semantics! Gall, guile—he’s got a master’s in manipulation, whichever one calls it.
“He can move or not.”
He dumped, divorced—his problem. Block the drama, savor the surprise bundle.
OP should stick with her family and raise the kiddo among the people she loves.
“It’s his turn to move.”
For a front-row seat in his child’s life, he can do the moving. The plot twist is his call—direct result of his past choices.
“He and his family can go to hell.”
In the unpredictable script of life, divorce and co-parenting are like uninvited plot twists in a sitcom—you never know when a laugh, a tear, or a surprise pregnancy will pop up. And just like in sitcoms, the best episodes are those where everyone learns to adapt and coexist!
Comment down your thoughts, or share this article for all your family and friends to see!
